Купить (625 RUB)
сгенерировать QR код
Открытый доступ
Доступ платный или только для Подписчиков
Зола уноса в бетоне: механизмы взаимодействия и продукты реакций. Часть II. Основные золы
https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2026-5-44-52
Аннотация
Проведён аналитический обзор исследований, посвящённых физико-химическим процессам, протекающим при взаимодействии высококальциевых зол с потрландцементом. Рассмотрены основные фазы, образующиеся в результате гидравлической и пуццолановой реакций основных зол. Подчеркнуты положительные и отрицательные стороны использования основных зол в производстве бетона. Показано, что ключевыми факторами управления свойствами являются контроль химического и фазового состава золы, её дозировка и использование методов активации (механической, химической, биологической). Сделан вывод о том, что щелочная активация и биоактивация микроорганизмами эффективны для ускорения пуццолановых реакций и повышения конечной прочности и долговечности бетона.
При поддержке: Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке Российского научного фонда (грант № 24-49-03004).
Об авторах
Р. В. Кулумбегов
Объединенный институт высоких температур РАН
Россия
Россия
канд. хим. наук, ст. инженер
Л. М. Делицын
Объединенный институт высоких температур РАН
Россия
Россия
д-р г.-м. наук, гл. науч. сотрудник
О. С. Попель
Объединенный институт высоких температур РАН
Россия
Россия
д-р техн. наук, гл. науч. сотрудник
М. Г. Сульман
Тверской государственный технический университет
Россия
Россия
д-р хим. наук, проректор по научной и инновационной деятельности
Ш. А. Гаджиев
ООО "ПРОМЭКОИНЖИНИРИНГ"
Россия
Россия
ген. директор
В. Б. Петропавловская
Тверской государственный технический университет
Россия
Россия
д-р техн. наук, профессор
Список литературы
1. Ge Z., Xue X., Fang H. Preparation and characterization of carbonated high-calcium fly ash as supplementary cementitious material. Construction and Building Materials. 2025. V. 466. 140285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140285
2. Sharonova O.M., Yumashev V.V., Solovyov L.A., Anshits A.G. The fine high-calcium fly ash as the basis of composite cementing material. Magazine of Civil Engineering 2019. V. 91(7), P. 60—72. DOI: 10.18720/MCE.91.6.
3. Thomas M., Jewell R., Jones R. Coal fly ash as a pozzolan. Coal Combustion Products. 2017. P. 121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100945-1.00005-8.
4. Yamei Zh., Wei S., Lianfei Sh. Mechanical properties of high performance concrete made with calcium high sulfate fly ash. Cem Concr Res. 1997. 27. P. 1093—1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00087-2.
5. Papadakis V.G. Effect of fly ash on Portland cement systems: Part II. Highcalcium fly ash. Cement and Concrete Research. 2000. V. 30. P. 1647—1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00388-4
6. Papadakis V.G. Effect of fly ash on Portland cement systems: I. Lowcalcium fly ash. Cement and Concrete Research. 1999. V. 29. P. 1727—1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00153-2
7. Santos Silva A., Soares D., Matos L. et al. Influence of Mineral Additions in the Inhibition of Delayed Ettringite Formation in Cement Based Materials – A Microstructural Characterization. Materials Science Forum. 2010. 636-637:1272-1279 DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.636-637.1272.
8. Vassilev S.V., Vassileva C.G., Karayigit A.I., et al. Phase-mineral and chemical composition of composite samples from feed coals, bottom ashes and fly ashes at the Soma power station. International Journal of Coal Geology 2005. V. 61. Р. 35—63. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2004.06.004.
9. Tishmack J.K., Olek J., Diamond S. Characterization of High-Calcium Fly Ashes and Their Potential Influence on Ettringite Formation in Cementitious Systems. Cement Concrete and Aggregates. 1999. V. 21. P. 82—92. DOI: 10.1520/CCA10512J.
10. Joshi N.R., Matsumoto A., Asamoto S., et al. Investigation of the mechanical behaviour of concrete with severe delayed ettringite formation expansion focusing on internal damage propagation under various compressive loading patterns. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022. V. 128. 104433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104433.
11. Luan C., Wu Zh., Han Z. et al. The effects of calcium content of fly ash on hydration and microstructure of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC). Journal of Cleaner Production. 2023. V. 415. 137735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137735.
12. Mulenga D.M., Stark J., Nobst P. Thaumasite formation in concrete and mortars containing fly ash. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2003. V. 25. P. 907—912 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00136-7.
13. Zatloukalová J. Zatloukal J. Kolář K. Konvalinka P. Thaumasite formation in cementitious composites used in underground repositories – Conditions and impact on composite's properties: A review. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 2024. V. 176. 105356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105356.
14. Chindaprasirt P., Thaiwitcharoen S., Kaewpirom S., Rattanasak U. Controlling ettringite formation in FBC fly ash geopolymer concrete. Cement & Concrete Composites. 2013. V.41. P. 24-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.04.009
15. Fletcher R.A, Mackenzie K.J.D, Nicholson C.L, Shimada S. The composition range of aluminosilicate geopolymers. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2005. V. 25(9). P. 1471—1477. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.06.001.
16. Clark B.A, Brown P.W. Formation of ettringite from monosubstituted calcium sulfoaluminate hydrate and gypsum. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1999. V. 82(10). P. 2900—2905. DOI:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02174.x.
17. Leklou N., Nguyen V.-H., Mounanga P. The Effect of the Partial Cement Substitution with Fly Ash on Delayed Ettringite Formation in Heat-cured Mortars. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2017. V. 21(4). P. 1359—136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0778-9.
18. Davidovits J. Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications. 5th edition. 2020. 680 p.
19. Provis J.L. Alkali-activated materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018. V. 114. P. 40—48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.009.
20. Williamson T., Juenger M.C.G. The role of activating solution concentration on alkali-silica reaction in alkali-activated fly ash concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 2016. V.83. P. 124—130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.008.
21. Бабаев Д.Д., Петропавловская В.Б., Новиченкова Т.Б. и др. Синтез геополимерных композиций на основе щелочных техногенных продуктов топливных станций. Вестник Тверского государственного технического университета. Сер. Строительство. Электротехника и химические технологии. 2023. № 4(20). С. 83—90. DOI 10.46573/2658-7459-2023-4-83-90.
22. Guo X., Shi H., Dick W.A. Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of class C fly ash geopolymer. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2010. V. 32. P. 142—147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.003.
23. Gomaa E., Peter S.S., et al. Mechanical properties of alkali activated concrete based class C fly ash. International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, and Management. Melbourne, Australia. July 2018.
24. Chalee1 W., Soeurt R., Pachana P., Songpiriyakij S. Improvement of High‑Volume Fly Ash Cementitious Material Using Single Alkali Activation. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials. 2021 V. 15. Р. 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-021-00482-9.
25. Kunther W., Ferreiro S., Skibsted J. Influence of the Ca/Si ratio on the compressive strength of cementitious calcium—silicate—hydrate binders. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2017. V. 5. 1740. DOI: 10.1039/C7TA06104H.
26. Hou X., Struble L.J., Kirkpatrick R.J. Formation of ASR gel and the roles of C-S-H and portlandite, Cem. Concr. Res. 2004. V. 34. P. 1683—1696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.03.026.
27. Figueira R.B., Sousa R., Coelho L., et al. Alkali-silica reaction in concrete: Mechanisms, mitigation and test methods. Construction and Building Materials. 2019. V. 222. P. 903-931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.230
28. Poole A.B. Alkali silica reactivity mechanisms of gel formation and expansion, in: Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Alkali-Silica React. Concr. ICAAR. London. England. 1992. P. 782—789.
29. Leemann A., Saout G.L., Winnefeld F., et al. Alkali-silica reaction: the influence of calcium on silica dissolution and the formation of reaction products. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011. V. 94. P. 1243—1249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04202.x.
30. Broekmans M.A.T.M. Structural properties of quartz and their potential role for ASR. Materials Characterization. 2004. V. 53 P. 129—140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2004.08.010.
31. Šachlová Š., Kucharová A., Pertold Z., et al. Quantitative assessment of alkali silica reaction potential of quartz-rich aggregates: comparison of chemical test and accelerated mortar bar test improved by SEM-PIA. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2017. V. 76 P. 133—144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0812-z.
32. Camacho-Chab J.C., Pereañez-Sacarías J.E, Camacho-Chab P.A. et al. Influence of bacterial biopolymers on physical properties of experimental limestone blocks. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022. V. 38. 254. doi: 10.1007/s11274-022-03438-7.
33. Jonkers H.M., Thijssen A., Muyzer G. et al. Application of bacteria as selfhealing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecological Engineering. 2010. V. 36. P. 230—235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.036.
34. Wiktor V., Jonkers H.M. Quantification of crack-healing in novel bacteria- based self-healing concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2011. V. 33. P. 763—770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.03.012.
35. Wang J., Vandevyvere B., Vanhessche S. er al. Microbial carbonate precipitation for the improvement of quality of recycled aggregates. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017. V. 156. P. 355-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.051.
36. Zhang L., Zheng M., Zhao D., Fen Y. A review of novel self-healing concrete technologies. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024. V. 89. 109331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109331.
37. Harmaji A., Ekaputri J.J. The Application of Microbes to the Fly Ash- Based Alkali-Activated Material Performance Containing Slag. Proceedings of the Green Materials and Electronic Packaging Interconnect Technology Symposium. 2023. P. 247—262. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-9267-4_28.
38. Purwanto H.A., Nugroho A., Aprilin S.R. Study of Volcanic-Ash-Impregnated-Bacteria Filler to the Compressive Strength of Concrete. The 6th International Conference of Euro Asia Civil Engineering Forum (EACEF 2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713801014.
39. Kim H.J., Eom H.J., Park C. et al. Calcium carbonate precipitation by Bacillus and sporosarcina strains isolated from concrete and analysis of the bacterial community of concrete. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016. V. 26. P. 540-548. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1511.11008.
40. Arias D., Cisternas L.A., Rivas M. Biomineralization mediated by ureolytic bacteria applied to water treatment: a review. Crystals. 2017. V. 7. 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7110345.
41. Doctolero J.Z.S., Beltran A.B., Uba M.O. et al. Self-healing biogeopolymers using biochar-immobilized spores of pure-and co-cultures of bacteria. Minerals. 2020. V. 10. 1114. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10121114.
42. Song M., Lan T., Meng Yu., et al. Effect of microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation treatment on the solidification and stabilization of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MSWI FA) – Based materials incorporated with metakaolin. Chemosphere. 2022. V. 308. 136089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136089.
43. Wulandari K.D., Ekaputri J.J., Kurniawan S.B. Effect of microbes addition on the properties and surface morphology of fly ash-based geopolymer paste. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021. V. 33. 101596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101596.
44. Achala V., Pana X., Özyurt N. Improved strength and durability of fly ashamended concrete by microbial calcite precipitation. Ecological Engineering. 2011. V. 37. P. 554—559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.009.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Кулумбегов Р.В., Делицын Л.М., Попель О.С., Сульман М.Г., Гаджиев Ш.А., Петропавловская В.Б. Зола уноса в бетоне: механизмы взаимодействия и продукты реакций. Часть II. Основные золы. Экология и промышленность России. 2026;30(5):44-52. https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2026-5-44-52
For citation:
Kulumbegov R.V., Delitsyn L.M., Popel O.S., Sulman M.G., Gadzhiev Sh.A., Petropavlovskaya V.B. Fly Ash in Concrete: Interaction Mechanisms and Reaction Products. Part II. Basic Ashes. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2026;30(5):44-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2026-5-44-52
Просмотров:
72
JATS XML
Послать статью по эл. почте 