Buy (625 RUB)
Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Why is Methodology So Important in Risk Assessment?
https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2023-3-66-71
Abstract
A retrospective analysis of the risk assessment methodology is carried out. The most authoritative sources and the established paradigm of risk assessment are considered. Some alternatives in the interpretation of risk assessment are shown. The importance of the correct interpretation of the risk assessment and the choice of the way to achieve it is noted.
About the Authors
D.E. Kucher
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor
S.G. Kharchenko
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Professor
References
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Interim procedures and guidelines for health risk and economic assessments of suspected carcinogens. Federal Register. 1976. 45: 79318-39379. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/90160G00.TXT? (дата обращения 17.06.2022).
2. National Academy of Sciences. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press. 1983. DOI: 10.17226/366. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/366/chapter/1.nlm.nih (дата обращения 17.06.2022).
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Framework for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001. 1992 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: epa.gov›risk/framework-ecologicalrisk-assessment (дата обращения 17.06.2022).
4. Graham J.D., Rhomberg L. How Risks are Identified and Assessed. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1996. Vol. 545. Iss. 1. P. 15—24. doi.org/10.1177/0002716296545001002.
5. COSO (2004). Enterprise risk management integrated framework. Technical report, Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commision (COSO). [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.acqnotes.com/Attachments/Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission Enterprise Risk Management Integrated Framework Executive Summary.pdf (дата обращения 20.08.2022).
6. Харченко С.Г., Дорохина Е.Ю. Есть ли в России нормативная база управления риском? Экология и промышленность России. 2011. Апрель. С. 58—61.
7. Харченко С.Г., Ананьева Р.В. Стандарты управления риском Австралии и Новой Зеландии. Экология и промышленность России. 2014. Январь. С. 52—57.
8. Кучер Д.Е., Харченко С.Г. Западный опыт управления риском в вузе. Экологическая безопасность: проблема понятий или источники ошибок. Экология и промышленность России. 2022. Т. 26. № 12. С. 64—71. DOI: 10.18412/1816-0395-2022-12-64-71
9. ГОСТ Р ИСО/МЭК. 31010-2011. Менеджмент риска. Методы оценки риска. ISO/IEC 31010:2009. Risk management - Risk assessment technique. М., Стандартинформ, 2012. 74 с. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://mega-norm.ru/Data2/1/4293791/4293791964.pdf (дата обращения 10.07.2022).
Review
For citations:
Kucher D., Kharchenko S. Why is Methodology So Important in Risk Assessment? Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2023;27(3):66-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2023-3-66-71
Views:
284
Email this article 