Buy (625 RUB)
Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Assessment Of Environmental Indicators During The Production Of A Steel Party By The Wire And Arc Additive Manufacturing Method: Energy Demand And Carbon Footprint
https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2025-11-42-49
Abstract
Two production methods for the same steel part – traditional forging and wire arc additive manufacturing – were compared. A life cycle assessment was conducted, including production and post-processing stages. Environmental indicators such as energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions were analyzed. It was found that total energy consumption for the additive manufacturing method was 9390.68 MJ, and greenhouse gas emissions amounted to 289.34 kg CO2-equivalent, which are 76.88 % and 96.58 % lower, respectively, compared to the traditional forging method.
About the Authors
F. N. Cardoso
Polytechnic School and School of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
Brazil
Master’s Degree Student
C. S. Guimarгes
School of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
Brazil
Ph.D in Chemistry, Professor
J.C. P. Filho
Metallurgical Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
Brazil
Ph.D in Mechanical Engineering, Professor
References
1. Industry 4.0. From information technology to manufacturing and operations management. Journal of Industrial Information. 2023. Vol. 33. P. 100456.
2. ASTM. F2792-12a Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International, 2012.[Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.astm.org/f2792-12a.html (address date 10.10.2024).
3. ASTM International. ASTM F42/ISO TC 261 Develops Additive Manufacturing Standards. 2021. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.astm.org/COMMIT/F42_AMStandardsStructureAndPrimer.pdf (address date 10.10.2024).
4. ASTM International. Committee F42 on Additive Manufacturing Technologies. 2021. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.astm.org/COMMITTEE/F42.htm (address date 10.10.2024).
5. Ding D., Pan Z., Cuiuri D., Li H. Wire-feed Additive Manufacturing of Metal Components: Technologies, Developments and Future Interests. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2015. Vol. 81. P. 465—481.
6. Meshalkin V.P., Zharov V.P., Leontiev L.I., Nzioka A.M., Belozersky A.Y. Sustainable Environmental Impact Assessment Using Indicators for Sustainable Energy-Intensive Industrial Production. Energies. 2023. Vol. 16. P. 3172.
7. ISO. Environmental labels and declarations: type III — Environmental declarations, principles and procedures. ISO 14025:2006-en. Geneva, ISO, 2006. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://goo.gl/Xw8FWo (address date 10.10.2024).
8. Caldeira-Pires A., Souza-Paula M.C. de, Villas Bôas R.C. A Avalio do ciclo de vida: a ISO 14040 na América Latina. Brasília, Abipti, 2005. 337 с.
9. Kieback B., Neubrand A., Riedel H. Processing techniques for functionally graded materials. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2003. Vol. 362. No. 1—2. P. 81—106.
10. Dass A., Moridi A. State of the art in directed energy deposition: From additive manufacturing to materials design. Coatings. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 7. P. 418.
11. Lincoln Electric. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.lincolnelectric.com/en/Products/er90sb3_gmaw (address date 10.08.2024).
12. Ecoinvent. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://ecoinvent.org/ecoinvent-v3-10/ (address date 05.08.2024).
13. Sword J.I., Galloway A., Toumpis A. An environmental impact comparison between wire+arc additive manufacture and forging for the production of a titanium component. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. 2023. Vol. 36. P. e00600.
14. Yusuf K., Lajus M., Ahmad A. Multiresponse Optimization and Environmental Analysis in Direct Recycling Hot Press Forging of Aluminium AA6061. Materials. 2019. Vol. 12. No. 12. P. 1918.
15. Priarone P.C., Campatelli G., Montevecchi F., Venturini G., Settineri L. A modelling framework for comparing the environmental and economic performance of WAAM-based integrated manufacturing and machining. CIRP Annals. 2019. Vol. 68. No. 1. P. 37—40.
16. MCTI. Relatуrios Bienais de Transparкncia — BTRs. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-omcti/sirene/publicacoes/relatorios-bienais-de-transparencia-btrs/BRA_BTR1_2024_ENG.pdf (address date 26.01.2025).
Review
For citations:
Cardoso F.N., Guimarгes C.S., Filho J.P. Assessment Of Environmental Indicators During The Production Of A Steel Party By The Wire And Arc Additive Manufacturing Method: Energy Demand And Carbon Footprint. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2025;29(11):42-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2025-11-42-49
Views:
74
JATS XML
Email this article 