Buy (625 RUB)
Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Know-how to Reduce the Toxicity of Gasoline-polluted Soil Using Peat and Peat Gel: Bench Tests
https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2022-9-54-59
Abstract
Advantages of using peat gel in comparison with untreated peat to reduce the toxicity of soils contaminated with oil products were shown. Biotesting has shown that using 5 % peat gel on a dry basis produces the same effect as 50 % pure peat. It is concluded that soil and environmental protection technologies based on soil treatment with peat gel are characterized by low consumption of biosorbent and effective reduction of toxicity.
About the Author
A.S. Olkova
Vyatka State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Associate Professor
References
1. Fuchsman C. Peat: industrial chemistry and technology. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2012. 298 p.
2. Kumari R., Dey S. A breakthrough column study for removal of malachite green using coco-peat. International journal of phytoremediation. 2019. Vol. 21(12). P. 1263—1271.
3. Matsuska O.V., Tsizhovska M.V., Khapko D.M. Perspective ecological processes of agricultural sewage water treatment when using nontraditional sorbents. Scientific Messenger of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series. Agricultural sciences. 2019. Vol. 21(91). P. 54—59.
4. Klavins M., Porshnov D. Development of a new peat-based oil sorbent using peat pyrolysis. Environmental technology. 2013. Vol. 34(12). P. 1577—1582.
5. Ghaly A.E., Pyke J.B. In-vessel bioremediation of oil-contaminated peat. Energy sources. 2001. Vol. 23(4). P. 305—325.
6. Силкин С.В., Куликов Е.Е., Куликов И.А. Исследование управляемого ультразвукового диспергирования торфа и бурого угля в воде. Труды МФТИ. 2018. Т. 10. № 3(39). С. 86—95.
7. Сырчина Н.В., Козвонин В.А., Сазанов А.В., Сазанова М.Л. Влияние продуктов кавитационной обработки торфа на почвы. Современные научные исследования и разработки. 2018. № 10(27). С. 833—838.
8. Rejen S. Importance des facteurs physic-chimiques sur la biodegradation des hydrocarbures polycycliques aromatiques (h) dans un sol contamin. Biotechnol. et environ. dev. Durable. Symp. Intern., Montreal, 23—26 sept., 1991. Programme offic. Montreal, 1991. P. 32—33.
9. Tarabukin D.V. Assessment of the Lowland Bog Biomass for Ex Situ Remediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Soils. Environments. 2020. Vol. 7(10). P. 1—11. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments7100086.
10. Coppock R.W., Dziwenka M.M. Biomarkers of petroleum products toxicity. In: Gupta RC (eds) Biomarkers in toxicology. Elsevier Inc. 2014. P. 647—654. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-404630-6.00037-3.
11. Encyclopedia of geochemistry: a comprehensive reference source on the chemistry of the earth. Ed. By WM White. Book Series "Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences". Cham, Switzerland, Springer international publishing, 2018. 1557 p. ISSN 1871-756X.
12. Dingemans M.M.L., Baken K.A., van der Oost R., Schriks M., van Wezel A.P. Risk-based approach in the revised European Union drinking water legislation: Opportunities for bioanalytical tools. Integrated environmental assessment and management. 2019. Vol. 15(1). P. 126—134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4096.
13. De Almeida Silva M., Espinoza Vйliz J.G., Pereira Sartori M.M., Luiz Santos H. Glyphosate applied at a hormetic dose improves ripening without impairing sugarcane productivity and ratoon sprouting. Science of the Total Environment. 2022. Vol. 806: 150503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150503.
14. Erofeeva E.A. Hormesis and paradoxical effects upon exposure to pollutants. Dose-Response. 2014. Vol. 12(1). P. 121—135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-018-1928-2.
Review
For citations:
Olkova A. Know-how to Reduce the Toxicity of Gasoline-polluted Soil Using Peat and Peat Gel: Bench Tests. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2022;26(9):54-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2022-9-54-59
Views:
293
Email this article 