Buy (625 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
New Ash and Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limit Levels for Large Combustion Plants and Best Available Techniques of Stack Gases Treatment
https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2021-8-40-46
Abstract
In order to determine new technological parameters for reviewing ITS 38-2017, the authors analyse coal properties and techniques for sulphur and ash removal from the stack gases. The technologies of ash purification and desulphurization of gases are analyzed and recommendations for their effective use are given. New technological emission parameters for ITS 38-2017 review proposed and recommendations provided for expanding the list of the Best Available Techniques to be implemented at Russian large combustion plants.
About the Authors
V.P. Meshalkin
Dmitry Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of Department
P.V. Roslyakov
Moscow Power Engineering Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor
T.V. Guseva
Research Institute ‘Environmental Industrial Policy Centre’
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Deputy Director
V.G. Dovi
Centro Interuniversitario di ricerca High Tech Recycling
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Chem), Professor, Research Coordinator
References
1. Best Available Techniques (BAT) for Preventing and Controlling Industrial Pollution. Activity 4: Guidance Document on Determining BAT, BAT-Associated Environmental Performance Levels and BAT-Based Permit Conditions. OECD: Environment, Health and Safety, Environment Directorate. 2020. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-management/guidance-document-on-determining-best-available-techniques.pdf (дата обращения 24.05.2021).
2. Скобелев Д.О. Экологическая промышленная политика: основные направления и принципы становления в России. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика. 2019. № 4. С. 78—94.
3. Skobelev D. Environmental Industrial Policy in Russia: Economic, Resource Efficiency and Environmental Aspects. Proceedings of the 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM. 2019. Vol. 19. Is. 5.2. P. 291—298. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2019/5.3/S21.037.
4. Evrard D., Laforest V., Villot J., Gaucher R. Best Available Technique assessment methods: A literature review from sector to installation level. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.096.
5. Best Available Techniques (BAT) for Preventing and Controlling Industrial Pollution. Activity 2: Approaches to Establishing Best Available Techniques Around the World. OECD: Environment, Health and Safety, Environment Directorate. 2018. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-management/approaches-to-establishing-best-available-techniques-around-theworld.pdf (дата обращения 24.05.2021).
6. ИТС 38-2017. Информационно-технический справочник по наилучшим доступным технологиям "Сжигание топлива на крупных установках с целью производства энергии". [Электронный ресурс] URL: http://burondt.ru/NDT/NDTDocsDetail.php?UrlId=1132&etkstructure_id=1872 (дата обращения 21.05.2021).
7. The Unpaid Health Bill. How coal power plants make us sick. A report from the Health and Environment Alliance. Brussels, 2013. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.env-health.org/ IMG/pdf/heal_report_the_unpaid_health_bill_how_coal_power_plants_make_us_sick_final.pdf (дата обращения 20.05.2021).
8. Air Quality Appraisal: Damage Cost Guidance. London, DEFRA, 2021. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/assess-the-impact-of-air-quality/air-quality-appraisal-damage-cost-guidance#annex-a-updated-2020-damage-costs (дата обращения 17.05.2021).
9. Finkelman R.B., Wolfe A., Hendryx M.S. The future environmental and health impacts of coal. Energy Geoscience. 2021. Vol. 2. Is. 2. P. 99—112. DOI: 10.1016/j.engeos. 2020.11.001.
10. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for Large Combustion Plants. European Commission. Joint Research Centre Science for Policy Report. Sevilla, 2017. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2019-11/JRC_107769_LCPBref_2017.pdf (дата обращения 21.05.2021).
11. Tomescu M., Alvarez D.M.M. Assessing the effectiveness of EU policy on large combustion plants in reducing air pollutant emissions. Luxembourg, European Environment Agency, 2019. 64 p.
12. Кондратьева О.Е., Росляков П.В., Гусева Т.В., Локтионов О.А. Основные задачи энергетических предприятий при получении комплексных экологических разрешений. Экология и промышленность России. 2018. Т. 22. № 4. С. 41—45. DOI: 10.18412/1816-0395-2018-4-41-45.
13. Цитцер О.Ю., Подругская О.А. Национальный проект "Экология" и федеральный проект "Чистый воздух": планы, реализация и перспективы в Челябинской области. Горизонты цивилизации. 2020. № 1(11). С. 315—327.
14. ГОСТ Р 50831-95. Установки котельные. Тепломеханическое оборудование. Общие технические требования.
15. Rezaei F., Rownaghi A.A., Monjezi S, Lively R.P., Jones C.W. SOX/NOX Removal from Flue Gas Streams by Solid Adsorbents: A Review of Current Challenges and Future Directions. Energy & Fuels. 2015. Vol. 29(9). P. 5467—5486. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01286.
Review
For citations:
Meshalkin V., Roslyakov P., Guseva T., Dovi V. New Ash and Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limit Levels for Large Combustion Plants and Best Available Techniques of Stack Gases Treatment. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2021;25(8):40-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2021-8-40-46
Views:
1697
Email this article 