Buy (625 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
World Experience in Rationing the Content of Chemical Elements in the Soil
https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2019-2-62-67
Abstract
Timely development of standards for soil quality is a prerequisite for environmental management. In Russia, the content in the soil of chemical elements (CE) is insufficiently studied, which is one of the reasons for the small number of developed not only maximum permissible, but also approximately permissible concentrations of CE in the soil. To solve the problem of rationing soil quality in Russia, the experience of such countries as Holland, Finland, Canada, and Germany can be adapted to domestic realities. So, to justify the production and economic standards, Finnish guideline values and Dutch intervention levels can be used; for soil assessment of playgrounds and residential areas – trigger levels of Germany, for residential and park areas and farmland – the relevant Canadian standards.
About the Authors
I.N. Semenkov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Geogr.), Research Scientist
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Geogr.), Research Scientist
T.V. Korolyeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Geogr.), Head of Laboratory
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Geogr.), Head of Laboratory
References
1. Carinon C. Derivation methods of soil screening values in Europe. A review and evaluation of national procedures towards harmonization. Ispra, European Commission, 2007. 306 p.
2. Brand E., Bogte J., Baars B.-J., Janssen P., Tiesjema G., van Herwijnen R., van Vlaardingen P., Verbruggen E. Proposal for Intervention Values Soil and Groundwater for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Series of Compounds. RIVM, 2012. 114 p.
3. Crommentuijn T., Sijim D., de Bruijin J. et al. Maximum permissible and negligible concentrations for metals and metalloids in the Netherlands, taking into account background concentrations. Journal of Environmental Management. 2000. Vol. 60. P. 121—143.
4. Lijzen J.P.A., Baars A.J., Otte P.F., Rikken M.G.J., Swartjes F.A., Verbruggen E.M.J., van Wezel A.P. Technical Evaluation of the Intervention Values for Soil. Sediment and Groundwater. RIVM Report 711701. 2001. 147 p.
5. Soil Remediation Circular. 2009. 57 p. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: www.esdat.net (дата обращения 10.12.2018).
6. Jarva J. Geochemical baselines in the assessment of soil contamination in Finland. Espoo, Geological Survey of Finland, 2016. 52 p
7. BBodSchV. Bundes-Bodenschutz-und Altlastenverordnung (BBodSchV) vom 12. Juli 1999. Bundesgesetzblatt I, 1554. 33 p.
8. CCME. Canadian Council for Ministers for the Environment. 2018. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://stts.ccme.ca/en/index.html (дата обращения 10.12.2018).
9. Eco-SSLs. Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil Screening Levels (Eco-SSLs). Review of Existing Soil Screening Benchmarks. 1999. 91p.
10. EPA. Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment. 2018 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.epa.gov/risk (дата обращения 10.12.2018).
11. Семенков И.Н. Формы нахождения металлов в суглинистых тундровых, таежных, подтаежных и лесостепных почвенно-геохимических катенах: Автореф. дис. … канд. геогр. наук. М., 2016. 24 с.
12. de Caritat P., Reimann C., Bastrakov E. et al. Comparing results from two continental geochemical surveys to world soil composition and deriving Predicted Empirical Global Soil (PEGS2) reference values. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 2012. Vol. 319—320. P. 269—276.
Review
For citations:
Semenkov I., Korolyeva T. World Experience in Rationing the Content of Chemical Elements in the Soil. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2019;23(2):62-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2019-2-62-67
Views:
891
Email this article 